“I am the only kid who steals dollar bills from his mom’s wallet”, he proudly claimed. When I asked why he said, “So that I can buy a lot of violent toys. I keep collecting lots of dollar bills so that I can buy loads of violent toys with them”.
Earlier that day his mum asked him what ‘violent’ means. “Fighting and bashing up”, he replied promptly with a big smile on his face.
It was at that point that I was wondering how creepy it is. If it were just that once that he’d mentioned the ‘violent toys’, I guess I wouldn’t have been that freaked out. The whole day, he kept harping about violent toys and how he loves fighting and making his toys fight. So I asked him, “What about stuff like Lego? Don’t you like playing with Lego?” His reply pleased me till he actually went on to elaborate on it. “Of course,” he said. “I love playing with Lego. But only the fighting figures – the guns and stuff. The other stuff is really boring”.
We try so hard to keep our kids away from ‘bad company’ and buy them toys so they can pass their time, as opposed to ‘mingling with the wrong crowd’. But the violence does seep in somehow, doesn’t it? Especially at a time like today where we find ourselves surrounded by in-your-face terror attacks. It’s all the more reason to unaccustom the children to the violence, I thought. But obviously, that’s not so. With toys and games aiming at an obsessive destruction, we’re making violence an everyday event.Maybe it’s just my paranoia that sees it as such a big problem, but the ‘fight’ bit of things just finds its way everywhere, especially in the lives of children. From cartoons to toys to glorification of victorious war stories in history books.
Television content is just so violent for children. It’s amazing to see small children glued to television watching something that defines a hero who readily bashes up the bad guy. The ‘hero’ is obviously stronger and armed with the better weapons, or equipped with better super powers. The bad guy is bad because he has a gun. But the good guy is better because he has a bigger gun to kill the bad guy with. What kind of twisted logic is that? If I were to merely transport this logic into the context of today, does it translate to ‘the guys with the ak-47s and grenades are bad, but the ones with the nuclear weapons are good’… So what if both are weapons of destruction!
We were heading back home and I took the stairs. He was waiting for the elevator – he had just begun to go in an elevator all by himself and jumped at any opportunity to use the elevator. The elevator was taking pretty long to come down and he was getting a little restless and impatient. He started kicking the wall and punching the elevator switch saying, “So you think you’re pretty strong, eh!” I was completely taken aback.
I guess it was partly because I’d been thinking about it all day yesterday. But it’s not completely untrue, right? After all, he’s just 6 years old!